Nicole: Difference between revisions
imported>Psych204B No edit summary |
imported>Psych204B mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
==== Pre-processing ==== | ==== Pre-processing ==== | ||
All data were slice-time corrected, motion corrected, and repeated scans were averaged together to create a single average scan for each subject. | All data were slice-time corrected, motion corrected, and repeated scans were averaged together to create a single average scan for each subject. | ||
[[File:PreprocPipeline.jpg | Figure 4: Preprocessing pipeline with addition of ART repair step.]] | |||
==== MNI space ==== | ==== MNI space ==== | ||
Revision as of 04:15, 14 March 2012
Back to Psych 204B Projects 2012
Background
Broad Context
- These data were collected as part of a larger study of transfer and the effectiveness of formula learning. - Materials: Polygon problem (IMAGES, etc.)
Trial Paradigm
- In each trial, participants saw the stimulus, computed the answer and responded using the trackball.
- The study timing was self-paced as in (ZEFFIRO REFERNCE) with jittering the ISI between each trial
Study Design
- Subjects received training before the scanner and then completed 3 trial blocks
-- In the present investigation, we're only looking at 7 participants in condition 2 and only considering the 2 formula blocks (not the choice block and not considering the transfer questions outside of the scanner).
The present investigation: Subject Motion
(Example of subject motion graph(s).)
A Potential Solution: Interpolation Using Motion Correction Algorithms
Methods
Subjects
Seven healthy volunteers participated in this study. Their mean age was 23.8 years old and four participants were male. These data were collected as part of a larger sample of 16 healthy volunteers (mean age 23.2 years old).
MR acquisition
Data were obtained on a GE scanner. Et cetera.
MR Analysis
The MR data was analyzed using SPM software tools. (PUT LINK TO SPM HERE!) Specifically, ART repair was used (LINK)
Pre-processing
All data were slice-time corrected, motion corrected, and repeated scans were averaged together to create a single average scan for each subject.
MNI space
MNI is an abbreviation for Montreal Neurological Institute.
After a pRF model was solved for each subject, the model was trasnformed into MNI template space. This was done by first aligning the high resolution t1-weighted anatomical scan from each subject to an MNI template. Since the pRF model was coregistered to the t1-anatomical scan, the same alignment matrix could then be applied to the pRF model.
Once each pRF model was aligned to MNI space, 4 model parameters - x, y, sigma, and r^2 - were averaged across each of the 6 subjects in each voxel.
Level 1 Analysis
Group Level Analyses
No Motion Correction
Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.
Using Motion Correction
Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.
Dropping A Subject With Too Much Motion
Some text. Some analysis. Some figures. Maybe some equations.
Equations
If you want to use equations, you can use the same formats that are use on wikipedia.
See wikimedia help on formulas for help.
This example of equation use is copied and pasted from wikipedia's article on the DFT.
The sequence of N complex numbers x0, ..., xN−1 is transformed into the sequence of N complex numbers X0, ..., XN−1 by the DFT according to the formula:
where i is the imaginary unit and is a primitive N'th root of unity. (This expression can also be written in terms of a DFT matrix; when scaled appropriately it becomes a unitary matrix and the Xk can thus be viewed as coefficients of x in an orthonormal basis.)
The transform is sometimes denoted by the symbol , as in or or .
The inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) is given by
Conclusions
Here is where you say what your results mean.
References - Resources and related work
References
Software
Art Repair
For more information about the SPM plugin ArtRepair, see: Art Repair


