Nicole
Back to Psych 204B Projects 2012
Background
Broad Context
- These data were collected as part of a larger study of transfer and the effectiveness of formula learning. - Materials: Polygon problem (IMAGES, etc.)
Trial Paradigm
- In each trial, participants saw the stimulus, computed the answer and responded using the trackball. - The study timing was self-paced as in (ZEFFIRO REFERNCE) with jittering the ISI between each trial UPLOAD AN IMAGE OF THE TRIAL PARADIGM
Study Design
- Subjects received training before the scanner and then completed 3 trial blocks - UPLOAD IMAGE OF ENTIRE STUDY DESIGN -- In the present investigation, we're only looking at 7 participants in condition 2 and only considering the 2 formula blocks (not the choice block and not considering the transfer questions outside of the scanner).
The present investigation: Subject Motion
(Example of subject motion graph(s).)
You can use subsections if you like.
Below is an example of a retinotopic map. Or, to be precise, below will be an example of a retinotopic map once the image is uploaded. To add an image, simply put text like this inside double brackets 'MyFile.jpg | My figure caption'. When you save this text and click on the link, the wiki will ask you for the figure.
Below is another example of a reinotopic map in a different subject.
Figure 2
Once you upload the images, they look like this. Note that you can control many features of the images, like whether to show a thumbnail, and the display resolution.

A Potential Solution: Interpolation Using Motion Correction Algorithms
MNI is an abbreviation for Montreal Neurological Institute.
Methods
Subjects
Seven healthy volunteers participated in this study. Their mean age was 23.8 years old and four participants were male. These data were collected as part of a larger sample of 16 healthy volunteers (mean age 23.2 years old).
MR acquisition
Data were obtained on a GE scanner. Et cetera.
MR Analysis
The MR data was analyzed using SPM software tools. (PUT LINK TO SPM HERE!) Specifically, ART repair was used (LINK)
Pre-processing
All data were slice-time corrected, motion corrected, and repeated scans were averaged together to create a single average scan for each subject. UPLOAD AN IMAGE OF THE PREPROCESSING STREAM TO HIGHLIGHT WHERE ART REPAIR MOTION CORRECTION OCCURRED.
MNI space
After a pRF model was solved for each subject, the model was trasnformed into MNI template space. This was done by first aligning the high resolution t1-weighted anatomical scan from each subject to an MNI template. Since the pRF model was coregistered to the t1-anatomical scan, the same alignment matrix could then be applied to the pRF model.
Once each pRF model was aligned to MNI space, 4 model parameters - x, y, sigma, and r^2 - were averaged across each of the 6 subjects in each voxel.
Level 1 Analysis
Group Level Analyses
No Motion Correction
Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.
Using Motion Correction
Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.
Dropping A Subject With Too Much Motion
Some text. Some analysis. Some figures. Maybe some equations.
Equations
If you want to use equations, you can use the same formats that are use on wikipedia.
See wikimedia help on formulas for help.
This example of equation use is copied and pasted from wikipedia's article on the DFT.
The sequence of N complex numbers x0, ..., xN−1 is transformed into the sequence of N complex numbers X0, ..., XN−1 by the DFT according to the formula:
where i is the imaginary unit and is a primitive N'th root of unity. (This expression can also be written in terms of a DFT matrix; when scaled appropriately it becomes a unitary matrix and the Xk can thus be viewed as coefficients of x in an orthonormal basis.)
The transform is sometimes denoted by the symbol , as in or or .
The inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) is given by
Conclusions
Here is where you say what your results mean.
References - Resources and related work
References
Software
Art Repair
For more information about the SPM plugin ArtRepair, see: Art Repair