Max: Difference between revisions
imported>Psych204B No edit summary |
imported>Psych204B mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[File:bodyparts_GLM.jpg | Figure 1]] | [[File:bodyparts_GLM.jpg | Figure 1]] | ||
= Methods = | = Methods = | ||
=== MR acquisition === | === MR acquisition === | ||
Data were obtained on a GE scanner. | Data were obtained on a 3-Tesla GE scanner. 12 slices were acquired at a resolution of 1.5 x 1.5 x 3.0 mm. TR was 1,000 ms and TE was 30 ms. Slices were acquired using a two-shot T2*-sensitive spiral acquisition sequence. The flip angle was 77 degrees and the field of view was 192 mm. | ||
=== MR Analysis === | === MR Analysis === | ||
| Line 44: | Line 27: | ||
==== Pre-processing ==== | ==== Pre-processing ==== | ||
Data were pre-processed (motion corrected, slice time corrected, etc.) by Weiner and colleagues. | |||
== HRFs vs. Deconvolution == | |||
== Multi-Voxel Patterns == | |||
= Results | = Results = | ||
== | == HRFs vs. Deconvolution == | ||
Some text. Some analysis. Some figures. | Some text. Some analysis. Some figures. | ||
Revision as of 02:41, 16 March 2012
Back to Psych 204 Projects 2009
fMRI-Adaptation and Getting to Know mrVista: Deconvolution & Multi-Voxel Patterns
Background
fMRI-Adaptation (fMRI-A) refers to the phenomenon that, as a region of cortex is activated by a stimulus repeatedly, it becomes less responsive overall to successive presentations of the stimulus. fMRI-A has been studied in depth (Grill-Spector et al., 2006, Weiner et al., 2010).
Choices as to how to analyze timecourse data in event-related designs can have important consequences. Shorter inter-stimulus intervals lead to signal overlap across trials and may induce dependencies and nonlinearities in a dataset.
Region of Interest (ROI) analyses provide crucial information, yet they also oversimplify data by boiling activation across an entire region down to a single timecourse. Multi-voxel patterns can be used to further investigate and characterize the distribution of activity within a region.
Methods
MR acquisition
Data were obtained on a 3-Tesla GE scanner. 12 slices were acquired at a resolution of 1.5 x 1.5 x 3.0 mm. TR was 1,000 ms and TE was 30 ms. Slices were acquired using a two-shot T2*-sensitive spiral acquisition sequence. The flip angle was 77 degrees and the field of view was 192 mm.
MR Analysis
The MR data was analyzed using mrVista software tools.
Pre-processing
Data were pre-processed (motion corrected, slice time corrected, etc.) by Weiner and colleagues.
HRFs vs. Deconvolution
Multi-Voxel Patterns
Results
HRFs vs. Deconvolution
Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.
Retinotopic models in individual subjects transformed into MNI space
Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.
Retinotopic models in group-averaged data on the MNI template brain
Some text. Some analysis. Some figures. Maybe some equations.
Equations
If you want to use equations, you can use the same formats that are use on wikipedia.
See wikimedia help on formulas for help.
This example of equation use is copied and pasted from wikipedia's article on the DFT.
The sequence of N complex numbers x0, ..., xN−1 is transformed into the sequence of N complex numbers X0, ..., XN−1 by the DFT according to the formula:
where i is the imaginary unit and is a primitive N'th root of unity. (This expression can also be written in terms of a DFT matrix; when scaled appropriately it becomes a unitary matrix and the Xk can thus be viewed as coefficients of x in an orthonormal basis.)
The transform is sometimes denoted by the symbol , as in or or .
The inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) is given by
Retinotopic models in group-averaged data projected back into native space
Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.
Conclusions
Here is where you say what your results mean.
References - Resources and related work
References
Software