2009 Christine McLeavey & Jessica Tsang

From Psych 221 Image Systems Engineering
Revision as of 20:32, 9 December 2009 by imported>Psych 204
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to Psych 204 Projects 2009

Testing the Ability of TBSS to Detect Tract Variations Between Groups

TBSS is a popular program[1] for exploring anatomical connectivity in the brain by analyzing anisotropic diffusion of water in white matter tracts. In this project, we create an artificial difference between the diffusion patterns of two otherwise similar groups, and determine TBSS's ability to find this difference.

Background

Tract-Based Spatial Statistics

Tracts of Interest

We consider the Arcuate tract to be the more difficult one for TBSS, as there are several other tracts in the neighbourhood that can potentially confuse tract assignment.

Occipital Tract

Occipital Tract
Occipital Tract

Arcuate Tract

Arcuate Tract


Methods

Assignment of kids into two groups

Cleaning Occipital Tract Data

Occipital tract data was opened using MrDiffusion, and then tracts pushed into CINCH for easier viewing.
Tracts were cleaned according to the following principles (and records kept describing the cleaning for each individual brain):
1. Thin tracts clearly not connected to a main tract were removed.
2. Tracts that did not begin and end in the right plane were removed.
3. Tracts that crossed the midline more than once were removed.
4. Tracts that looped into other quadrants of the brain were removed.

Occipital Cleaning (top)
Occipital Cleaning (side)



MR acquisition

MR Analysis

The MR data was analyzed using mrVista software tools.

Pre-processing

All data were slice-time corrected, motion corrected, and repeated scans were averaged together to create a single average scan for each subject. Et cetera.

PRF model fits

PRF models were fit with a 2-gaussian model.

MNI space

After a pRF model was solved for each subject, the model was trasnformed into MNI template space. This was done by first aligning the high resolution t1-weighted anatomical scan from each subject to an MNI template. Since the pRF model was coregistered to the t1-anatomical scan, the same alignment matrix could then be applied to the pRF model.
Once each pRF model was aligned to MNI space, 4 model parameters - x, y, sigma, and r^2 - were averaged across each of the 6 subjects in each voxel.

Et cetera.


Results - What you found

Retinotopic models in native space

Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.

Retinotopic models in individual subjects transformed into MNI space

Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.

Retinotopic models in group-averaged data on the MNI template brain

Some text. Some analysis. Some figures. Maybe some equations.


Equations

If you want to use equations, you can use the same formats that are use on wikipedia.
See wikimedia help on formulas for help.
This example of equation use is copied and pasted from wikipedia's article on the DFT.

The sequence of N complex numbers x0, ..., xN−1 is transformed into the sequence of N complex numbers X0, ..., XN−1 by the DFT according to the formula:

Xk=n=0N1xne2πiNknk=0,,N1

where i is the imaginary unit and e2πiN is a primitive N'th root of unity. (This expression can also be written in terms of a DFT matrix; when scaled appropriately it becomes a unitary matrix and the Xk can thus be viewed as coefficients of x in an orthonormal basis.)

The transform is sometimes denoted by the symbol , as in 𝐗={𝐱} or (𝐱) or 𝐱.

The inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) is given by

xn=1Nk=0N1Xke2πiNknn=0,,N1.

Retinotopic models in group-averaged data projected back into native space

Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.

Conclusions

Here is where you say what your results mean.

References - Resources and related work

References
[1] Smith, Steven M. et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: Voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. NeuroImage 31 (2006) 1487-1505.

Software

Appendix I - Code and Data

Code

Matlab Code for Reducing FA

Data

zip file with my data

Appendix II - Work partition

Christine is new to fMRI work and did much of the brunt work - she divided the kids into two groups and showed the groups to be well matched statistically. She did the cleaning of the occipital tracts for each of the 55 kids and wrote the wiki page. Jessica provided the brains and experience and devised the way to reduce the FA in the tracts of one group, ran the results through TBSS, ran statistics on those results, and generally taught Christine the ropes.