Bragi Sveinsson

Back to Psych 204 Projects 2009

Correction of magnetic field distortion in EPI images

Magnetic field inhomogeneities are the most common cause of distortions in fMRI images, which make matching of data to the high-resolution structural images difficult. Various methods have been proposed to correct for this distortion. For this project, some of these methods were examined and tested on EPI data. In particular, a toolbox based on magnetic field mapping methods and developed for the SPM software environment, was tested on EPI data provided by the VISTA lab. Furthermore, the toolbox was integrated better into the mrVista software environment to make it work without installing SPM.

Background

Causes of field disturbances

The main reason for magnetic field disturbances in MRI imaging is the different magnetic susceptibility of the different materials in the brain. A material's magnetic susceptibility is the degree of magnetization of the material when an outside magnetic field is applied. In areas of the head where two materials with different susceptibilities meet, especially near cavities such as the sinuses in the frontal lobe or the ear canals in the temporal lobes where you have a junction of water and air, the magnetic field will behave in a way that looks quite erratic. The exact disturbance of the field will behave on the size and shape of the cavity and its orientation relative to the magnetic flux, and will thus change should the subject move in the scanner. Disturbances can also arise when you have blood flow in nearby large vessels, such as around the sagittal sinus, although this effect is less of a problem.

The effect of field disturbances on EPI images

During EPI imaging, each voxel in the object being imaged emits a series of echoes that identify its position - the frequency within the echoes gives its position in the frequency encode direction, and the phase difference between consecutive echoes gives its position in the phase-encode direction.

Field disturbances at a particular point in space cause the field to be slightly different than what would be expected under normal condition at that point. Then, during read-out, its signal will have a slightly different frequency than normal (we recall that the Larmor frequency varies linearly with field strength) so when the image is constructed the corresponding voxel will be displaced in the frequency encode direction. The magnitude of this displacement depends on the magnitude of the field disturbance. Since the disturbance magnitude is usually very small compared to the gradient field, this effect in the frequency encode direction is usually negligible. However, this change in frequency also leads to a change in phase difference between consecutive echoes. This causes a displacement in the phase encoded direction as well, and since this disturbance affects the measurement through the whole read-out but the gradient is only applied for a short time, this displacement can be considerable and can not be neglected.

The effects from this can be minimized by making the read-out time shorter or applying the gradient for a longer time period, but this generally results in lower image resolution unless more advanced techniques of spatial encoding are used. That leads us to correcting for these errors using magnetic field map techniques.

Subsection test

You can use subsections if you like. Below is an example of a retinotopic map. Or, to be precise, below will be an example of a retinotopic map once the image is uploaded. To add an image, simply put text like this inside double brackets 'MyFile.jpg | My figure caption'. When you save this text and click on the link, the wiki will ask you for the figure.

Below is another example of a reinotopic map in a different subject.
Figure 2

Once you upload the images, they look like this. Note that you can control many features of the images, like whether to show a thumbnail, and the display resolution.

Figure 3

MNI space

MNI is an abbreviation for Montreal Neurological Institute.

Methods

Measuring retinotopic maps

Retinotopic maps were obtained in 5 subjects using Population Receptive Field mapping methods Dumoulin and Wandell (2008). These data were collected for another research project in the Wandell lab. We re-analyzed the data for this project, as described below.

Subjects

Subjects were 5 healthy volunteers.

MR acquisition

Data were obtained on a GE scanner. Et cetera.

MR Analysis

The MR data was analyzed using mrVista software tools.

Pre-processing

All data were slice-time corrected, motion corrected, and repeated scans were averaged together to create a single average scan for each subject. Et cetera.

PRF model fits

PRF models were fit with a 2-gaussian model.

MNI space

After a pRF model was solved for each subject, the model was trasnformed into MNI template space. This was done by first aligning the high resolution t1-weighted anatomical scan from each subject to an MNI template. Since the pRF model was coregistered to the t1-anatomical scan, the same alignment matrix could then be applied to the pRF model.
Once each pRF model was aligned to MNI space, 4 model parameters - x, y, sigma, and r^2 - were averaged across each of the 6 subjects in each voxel.

Et cetera.

Results - What you found

Retinotopic models in native space

Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.

Retinotopic models in individual subjects transformed into MNI space

Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.

Retinotopic models in group-averaged data on the MNI template brain

Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.

Retinotopic models in group-averaged data projected back into native space

Some text. Some analysis. Some figures.

Conclusions

Here is where you say what your results mean.

References - Resources and related work

References

Software

Appendix I - Code and Data

Code

zip file with code

Data

zip file with my data

Appendix II - Work partition (if a group project)

Brian and Bob gave the lectures. Jon mucked around on the wiki.